While proponents of Prop 102 encourage every individual to uphold and honor their own beliefs in regards to this proposition, there seems to be much confusion associated with the intentions of Prop 102. With this in mind, it is recommended that every person develop their own opinion based on the actual facts before casting a vote in November.

While Prop 102 does seek to clearly define marriage as being the union between a man and woman it does not seek to deny benefits to any individual, couple or group. This has been a major point of confusion for many people, but it should be pointed out that by defining the term “marriage” as the union between a man and woman Prop 102 does not prevent any individual from living the way they choose to live. Moreover, Prop 102 does not seek to limit anybody’s benefits or rights. The fact is the proposition has nothing to do with rights in any way.

Prop 102 only seeks to clearly define the word “marriage,” any other intent or implications associated with the proposition is at the fault of the assigner. The entire proposition is only 20 words long. And the entirety of Prop 102 is strictly related to the definition of marriage.

Prop 102 reads as follows: “Only the union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.” Prop 102 appears on the ballot this November for the sole purpose of maintaining the traditional definition of marriage and in no way seeks to restrict the rights of any individuals.

Another misconception about Prop 102 is that it is the same as Prop 107 which failed to pass in 2006. While the two propositions are similar, there are some absolute differences. In 2006, Prop 107 included the phrase; “No legal status for unmarried persons shall be created or recognized by this state or its political subdivisions that is similar to that of marriage.” Those who opposed the proposition considered this to be an attempt to limit the domestic partner benefits of unwed individuals. Prop 102 is different because it only seeks to define marriage as the union between a man and woman and has no ties to domestic partner benefits.

Supporters of Prop 102 are often thought of as being solely conservative individuals are members of religious groups, but the fact is the proponents of Prop 102 are individuals from all walks of life with a variety of affiliations. Supporters of the proposition are from all cultures, religions and political sides.

Prop 102 is not an issue of liberal vs. conservative or democrat vs. republican. It’s not about denying rights or benefits. It’s simply about maintaining the traditional definition of marriage. Prop 102; simple and clear.